User:Spiritdude

My name is Rene K. Mueller, got interested in RepRap a few years ago but didn't follow up as the first models were expensive and too complex to build and use - this changed and since about December 2011 got interested more thoroughly again, thanks to several Kickstarter projects, such as Printrbot.

Contributions

• MakiBox, wiki-page started and basic information (not my invention, just realized it wasn't in the wiki yet)
• trying to put some structure and compareable numbers for each RepRap:
  • Printed vs Non-Printed Items (calculate a RepRapFactor)
  • Printing-Size / Building Volume
  • Material Cost (just the items)
  • Cost (assembled)
  • Precision (position/printing)
  • Speed (position/printing)

Favourite RepRaps

High Complexity

• Mendel aka "Sells Mendel", classic (1x Z-axis motor), Z-axis is X/Y-way stabilized

Not recommended to build since simpler versions exist:

Medium Complexity

• Prusa Mendel, (2x Z-axis motors), printed parts massively simplified - quasi standard now
  • DurbiePrusaMendel, further refined
  • MendelMax, further refined

Low Complexity

• Printrbot, loosly based on Prusa Mendel, very simple, Z-axis in the open (one end fixated)
  • Wallace, parametric version, Z-axis in the open
  • Portabee, Z-axis in the open

• Bukobot, alike Printrbot but with aluminium extrusions (very rigid) and Z-axis is X-way stabilized
• FoldaRap, with aluminium extrusions, Z-axis is X-way stabilized, foldable

All-In-One

• FoldaRap, power-supply & controller nicely integrated, speciality: foldable (easy to transport)
• MakiBox, case with power-supply, controller, all in a box, speciality: pellets to filament converter built-in (still in development)

Considerations

The Mendel based RepRap's are very rigid as the illustration shows, the top points are fully triangulate and therefore stable.

Whereas the more simple ones, "Low Complexity" RepRaps like Printrbot, Wallace and Portabee seem to sacrifice the rigidity of the Z-axis by skipping the stabilization: Z-axis is in the open (only one end fixated), possible source of vibration to X-way and Y-way, even though the printing head / bearing provide some X-way stability at the height. Therefore at higher Z-elevation Y-way and X-way vibrations may decrease the position and printing precision, in particular at high speed printing and heavier printing heads (e.g. multi extruders).

The Bukobot and FoldaRap adapts the simplicity of the "Low Complexity" RepRaps and adds some rigidity back by using aluminium extrusions instead of threaded rods, as well one stabilization of the Z-axis by a top strut leaving Y-way vibrations.

Ideally, the printing base is moved only Y-way (in those considered here), but in real world will shake the entire construction - perceive the RepRap as a complex music instrument in vibration with its own resonance - any part which can vibrate WILL vibrate. It is therefore desired to reduce the "open ends" which likely will vibrate and triangulate them to maintain precision in position and printing at any point within the printing or building volume.

Whether a threaded rod vs aluminium extrusion frame is closer or farther from RepRap I can't tell yet - it depends which part likely will be easier to printed in the future.

The MakiBox aims to be an All-In-One, you fill in pellets (1-2mm large pieces of material), it creates filament internally for the extruder - ideal for recycling. It's still in development stage (2012-07).

My Thoughts

On 3D Printing: 3D Printing - The Next Technical Revolution (2012/07)

Contact

Email: spiritdude AT gmail DOT com