User talk:Tesla893
Revision as of 22:45, 7 April 2011 by Sebastien Bailard (talk | contribs) (Created page with 'Regarding Mixtape mendel, ''(Updated, more to come. Do not know if the licensing is OK. Everything in the repo is my own code. )'', :BSD-licensed Mendel remixes lead into cl…')
Regarding Mixtape mendel, (Updated, more to come. Do not know if the licensing is OK. Everything in the repo is my own code. ),
- BSD-licensed Mendel remixes lead into closed-source Mendel remixes and cc-by-nc-nd remixes. Those trigger conflict when we host them in the wiki.
- I'd strongly suggest regarding the GPL's "stickyness" as sticking to downstream Mendel-flavored stuff, and as such, it would be good to relabel your work GPL, if you'd like. It's not ... precisely compulsory, since reprap doesn't "do" rules, beyond labeling original mendel GPL in the expectation that downstream versions would be GPL...
- I'm not feeling militant, or in the mood for watching folk play open-source warrior in reprap-dev-policy, but do keep it in mind. You're not playing games, but you're making it easier for other folk to play games. This is more of an issue with electronics than with printed stuff, it's not the end of the world but it enables odd-licensed electronics.
- So ...?
- --Sebastien Bailard 02:45, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
