MetalicaRap:Physics Principles

From RepRap
Revision as of 09:43, 1 January 2011 by Rapatan (talk | contribs) (Discussion)
Jump to: navigation, search

Principles

Following EBM metal vaporisation loss of vacuum leading to loss of beam quality

cal

Problem: Pressure from evaporated material

Example from “Practial manufacturing walk through” will add in soon!

Vaporizing Titanium at with .04 W into metal volume evaporating at the price of <math>5*10^4 J/cm^3</math> evaporates

<math>\frac{0.04W}{5*10^4 J/cm^3}=8*10^{-7} cm^3</math>

With the density of metallic Ti 4.5 g/cm3 the above volume amounts to 3.6x10-6 g. And with a molar mass of Ti 204.37 g/mol it is 1.76x10-8 mol. Now: ONE mole of a gas takes a volume of 24 Liter at a pressure of 1 atmosphere or 101,325 Pa = 1013.25 millibar. Relative to this an amount of 1.76x10-8 mol vaporized titanium in a 1000 L (1 m3) volume will per second contribute to the pressure with the following value;

<math>=\Delta P /S =\frac{1.76*10^{-8} mol/s}{1 mol}*\frac{24L}{1000L}*1013.25 mBar =4.43*10^{-7} mBar/s </math>


Thus the pump has to remove 4.3x10-7 millibars of pressure per second. Maybe this is not at all a problem. I don’t know about pumping capacities . I just wanted to put attention to it.


PS: According to my tables the heat of evaporation of Ti is not 5x104 but 4x104 J/cm3 (8.953 MJ/kg times 4.5x103 kg/m3

Discussion

Problem: Pressure from evaporated material

Not problem with tubo-pump but could be a problem with oil diffusion pump? what are typical oil diffusion pump pumping rates?.



[1] Maths formula Wiki authoring Help.