Walkabout

From RepRap
Revision as of 02:11, 10 November 2009 by Sebastien Bailard (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

These are notes I need to formalize:

10 Anna has a RepRap, makes a daughter RepRap (or the plastic parts) 20 Anna loans the daughter RepRap (or parts) to Bob for ~2 * time to build, print. 25 Bob builds, prints. 30 Bob passes a machine (etc.) on to Carol.

Rinse, repeat, GOTO 10

Inset: There's a slight relation to something which might be a 'koa chain' of gifts, as per "Doorways in the Sand" by Zelazny, but I don't have another citation for it. This is more like seed corn or a barnraising, anyway.

Resource Distribution Protocols

Q: Do we need a mechanism to stamp out bad actors {procrastinators/people who don't return library books}?

A: I hope the community will take care of that. This is functionally a gift economy, which use built in human software (shame, compassion, etc) to enforce reputations. We can just have Carol gently nudge/ax Bob if Bob is having trouble. And normally Anna will wait until Bob has his motors spinning and his extruder working before passing on the set of parts.

If Bob is mucking around with something that belongs to the commons, we the commons will have to take care of it, in a compassionate/hand ax sort of way. And there will be a blog and flickr feed that follows the machine. It starts at a robotics club at a community college, then goes to a local k-12 school robot club, then over to a robotics club/artist run center in another city, and so on.

It's really Anna's decision what happens to the machine she loaned to the commons. Carol, or whoever, has it in trust. If Anna wants, she can donate it to sort of nebulous RepRap group, and we'll take care of it/gently nudge bad actors while meaningfully sharpening an ax.